PAI

Beta · For UK planning consultants and architects

Stop reading 200 appeal decisions to find the three that matter.

PAI is the AI research and drafting workspace for UK planning. Search every PINS decision, get answers cited to real cases, and draft what you'd write next — in minutes, not days.

See how it works
PAI · ChatSearching · 3 sources
Find Green Belt cases where VSC was accepted for converting redundant agricultural buildings.
P

Three recent decisions allowed conversion in the Green Belt where very special circumstances were accepted. The strongest precedent is Case 3245678 — the Inspector found that economic re-use of a redundant agricultural building outweighed harm to openness, given the building's sound condition.

See also Case 3198104 for a similar grain store conversion in West Berkshire.

What it does

Three jobs. One workspace.

Search every case, and every document inside it.

116,000+ Planning Inspectorate appeal cases, with every document indexed down to the paragraph. Filter by authority, outcome and date, search the full text of any document, or just ask in plain English. Hybrid keyword + semantic search, then reranked.

Get answers anchored to real cases.

Every [Case 3245678] reference is a real decision, not a hallucination. Click any citation to jump straight to the source document, opened on the paragraph that mattered.

Draft the documents you'd write next.

Statements of case, planning statements, proofs of evidence, heritage impact assessments, design & access statements, risk analyses. PAI drafts. You edit. You keep the pen.

The corpus

Fresh, not frozen.

Built on the Planning Inspectorate's published decisions, scraped continuously. The corpus you search today includes decisions from this month.

116,000+Appeal cases
~20,000Added per year
AutoUpdated continuously from PINS
Every wordIndexed — not just metadata

Trust

Cited, so you can check.

Other AI tools confidently invent case references. PAI doesn't — every [Case …] in an answer is a real PINS decision, one click from the source document opened on the exact paragraph.

AI can still get things wrong, so we make it fast to verify everything it tells you.

PAI · Chat
P

The strongest precedent is Case 3245678 — the Inspector accepted that the building's economic re-use outweighed Green Belt harm.

See para 47 for the VSC reasoning, and Case 3198104 for a parallel grain store decision.

Case 3245678 · Inspector's Decisionp. 7

Paragraphs 45–47

47. I find that the economic re-use of this redundant agricultural building, in sound structural condition and well-served by the existing access, constitutes very special circumstances which clearly outweigh the harm to the openness of the Green Belt…

PAI · Chat
Here's the refusal notice. Find precedents for the Green Belt issue.
P

Three strong precedents: Case 3245678, Case 3198104 and Case 3271993. All allowed on VSC grounds for analogous redundant rural buildings.

Draft me a statement of case using these.
P

Drafted — see the panel on the right. I've marked site-specific details with [placeholders] for you to fill.

Statement of Case · Draftv2

1. The Site

The appeal site comprises a single-storey agricultural building at [Site Address] within the Metropolitan Green Belt.

2. Grounds of Appeal

The application was refused on [Refusal Date] on the grounds that the proposal would constitute inappropriate development. The Appellant submits that very special circumstances exist, supported by Case 3245678 and Case 3198104.

Drafting

From your refusal notice to a finished draft, in one conversation.

Drop in your refusal notice, site plans or any background you have. Ask PAI to find the precedents that matter. Read the analysis. Then say “draft me a statement of case” — and it will, in the side panel, citing the precedents it used and marking site-specific details with [placeholders] for you to fill.

Drafts are versioned. Revise as you go. You keep the pen.

What it'll draft for you

  • Statement of case
  • Planning statement
  • Proof of evidence
  • Heritage impact assessment
  • Design & access statement
  • Risk analysis
  • Comparison tables, memos, and anything else you describe

How you work

A workspace, not a chatbot.

Projects

Group chats by client, site or appeal. One project per job.

Bookmarks

Save the cases that matter to each project for later.

Your files, on hand

Upload site plans, refusal notices, statements. Reuse across chats.

Shareable links

Send a chat to a colleague or client with one URL. Read-only, no sign-in needed.

Frontier AI

Powered by the latest models from Anthropic and Google. We pick the right one for the job, with extended thinking on the harder questions.

Document viewer

Every appeal document parsed and rendered for fast reading, with one-click jumps to the exact paragraph cited.

Roadmap

Coming next.

Soon

Case alerts

Watch a specific case and get an email the moment it updates.

Soon

Regional monitoring

Subscribe to an authority or region — get notified when relevant new decisions land.

Soon

NPPF 2026 support

As the revised National Planning Policy Framework lands this year, PAI will help you re-assess live applications, understand what’s changed, and surface precedents that still apply under the new rules.

Pricing

Free for now, while we're in beta.

Paid plans will arrive once we're out of beta. Beta users will get meaningful discounts and plenty of notice before anything changes.

Beta

Early access, while we're in beta.

We're working with a small group of consultants and architects to refine PAI. It's free for now, while we're in beta. If your work involves planning appeals — or you wish someone had built a better way to research them — leave your email and we'll get you in.

Who's behind PAI

PAI is a project by Studio Bark — environmental architects crafting radical, zero-carbon design — in collaboration with David Sinclair, a product builder and engineer working on tools for the built environment.